The US stock market is currently experiencing one of its most expensive phases relative to government bonds since the dotcom era of the early 2000s. This trend has raised concerns among investors, particularly as megacap technology companies and other Wall Street stocks continue to soar to record highs.
The Equity Risk Premium Hits Historic Lows
The forward earnings yield of the S&P 500 index, which measures expected profits as a percentage of stock prices, has dropped to 3.9%. Meanwhile, 10-year Treasury bond yields have risen to 4.65%. This has pushed the equity risk premium—the extra compensation investors demand for holding stocks over bonds—into negative territory, a level not seen since 2002.
Ben Inker, co-head of asset allocation at GMO, commented, *“Investors are effectively saying, ‘I want to own these dominant tech companies, and I am prepared to do it without much of a risk premium.’ I think that is a crazy attitude.”*
The Role of the Magnificent Seven
The rally in US equities is largely driven by the so-called “Magnificent Seven” tech stocks, which include giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon. Many investors believe these companies are too critical to exclude from their portfolios, despite concerns about market concentration and overvaluation.
Analysts attribute the steep valuations to a combination of strong economic growth, robust corporate profits, and the fear of missing out on the tech-driven rally. However, this has led to a market that is increasingly top-heavy, with a small number of stocks driving the majority of gains.
The Fed Model and Its Critics
The equity risk premium is often measured using the “Fed model,” which compares stock earnings yields to Treasury bond yields. However, this model has its detractors. Cliff Asness, founder of AQR, criticized the use of Treasury yields as an “irrelevant” benchmark in a 2003 paper, arguing that the equity risk premium fails as a predictive tool for stock returns.
Some analysts now use inflation-adjusted bond yields to calculate the equity risk premium. By this measure, the premium is also at its lowest level since the dotcom era, though it remains positive. Miroslav Aradski, senior analyst at BCA Research, noted that the premium might even understate how expensive stocks are, as it assumes earnings yields accurately reflect future returns.
Are High Valuations Justified?
While some investors see the high valuations as a red flag, others argue they are justified given the current economic environment. Goldman Sachs’ senior equity strategist Ben Snider stated that the S&P 500’s price-to-earnings (PE) ratio is in line with the firm’s fair value model, which accounts for factors like interest rates and labor market health.
“The good news is that earnings are growing, and even with unchanged valuations, earnings growth should drive equity prices higher,”* Snider added.
Risks Ahead
Despite the optimism, there are concerns about the sustainability of the rally. The recent sell-off in Treasuries has highlighted the delicate balance between bond yields and stock prices. Pimco’s chief investment officer warned that relative valuations between bonds and equities are as wide as they’ve been in a long time, and policies driving bond yields higher could also hurt stocks.
Moreover, the concentration of gains in a handful of tech stocks poses risks to diversified portfolios. Andrew Pease, chief investment strategist at Russell Investments, advised, *“Even though the momentum is strong on the Mag 7, this is the year where you want to be diversified on your equity exposure.
Conclusion
The US stock market’s current valuation relative to bonds is a clear sign of investor exuberance, particularly in the tech sector. While some believe the high multiples are justified, others warn of potential risks, including market concentration and the impact of rising bond yields. As always, diversification and careful risk management remain key for long-term investors.
0 Comments